CPAS has been critical in advancing several A4P+ priorities and supports the New Agenda for Peace, the digital transformation of peacekeeping, and the Secretary General’s Data Strategy.
All 11 Peacekeeping Missions use CPAS to regularly and systematically assess collective Mission performance
82 Impact assessments completed across all missions, with recommendations presented to leadership
Over 110,000 impact data points now in the system across more than 1000 indicators, and growing daily
33 factsheets for the Security Council and other briefings
6 Missions are including data visuals in Reports of the Secretary General
Guided by leadership, missions articulate a prioritized, whole-of-mission plan for mandate delivery that clearly links mission work to the impact the mission aims to have. Indicators are set to help monitor progress.
Mission components and sections implement this prioritized plan, along with any additional work, tracking indicator data along the way.
Informed by the data collected, missions conduct regular impact assessments, analyzing collective progress towards goals and identifying recommendations for strengthening operations. These assessments are internal to the mission, but are used to inform planning and existing reporting.
Assessments are used to inform leadership decision-making and updates to the mission plan, restarting the cycle, and ensuring future operations are informed by past performance and impact.
- Helps prioritize and sequence complex mandates to operationalize their vision
- Enables evidence-based decision-making by bringing together data and analysis from mission staff
- Helps leaders allocate resources where they are most impactful
- Lets managers develop integrated, cross-mission plans
- Facilitates evaluation of impact on the conflict environment and access to analysis from the ground
- Empowers managers to make recommendations to mission leadership on how to increase impact
- Empowers staff on the ground to help shape the mission’s strategic and operational plan
- Encourages closer collaboration between sections and components
- Empowers staff to make recommendations on how mission can be more effective
- Improves communication between HQ & the field on mission impact and context
- Assesses mission performance to adapt strategic and operational plans
- Promotes a more efficient and effective use of resources
- Improves visibility on impact of missions over time, backed by data and analysis
- Strengthens transparency and accountability for use of funds in peacekeeping
- Increases accountability to member states who access impact data from missions
- Improves peacekeeping impact assessment